- โบโโง Beyond the Headlines โงโโบ
- 4/6/2025
Why was this made?
AI has potential, but at what cost? I am going to call out a lot of issues with AI, but I still believe it has potential across most fields.
Not every field tho, every tool has it's place and Ai keeps getting forced into everything when it doesn't have to. You wouldn't use a rocket launcher to kill a roach. Using a tool like this and wasting precious resources on things that don't require Ai is selfish as fuck๐.
I think it's good to experiment with how it could help some fields, but
putting it in everything just for the hell of it is beyond dumb. Having said that, It can still bring positive change if used correctly.
The problem is that we wonโt get to that point if we treat AI like a banana republic. I am also going to be talking very critically about managers and business owners who exploit workers while not actually contributing anything themselves.
I know this isn't everyone and there is good leadership out there but the majority is not. AI isnโt just a tool anymore. Itโs quickly becoming a core part of a lot of businesses and government. The way itโs built, trained, and used affects EVERYONE.
Not just creators who have their work stolen.
Not just investors who WILL lose a ton of money when the hype dies.
EVERYONE will be affected by these changes.
If we let them create a whole new narrative we wonโt own ANYTHING.
I know this sounds like "a do0MeR tAkE" simply because it's not guaranteed but simping over some hypothetical utopia is just as stupid, realistically it's worse. Big Tech is centralizing power more every day, so nothing points towards this utopia other than CEOs fantasizing over the idea of holding all the power.
Any kind of ethical move big tech makes is AFTER backlash. SO by staying quite we are letting them change the rules and we can't be scared to call it like it is out of fear that we will be labeled "d00MeRs"
Exploitation is masquerading as innovation.
Just look at places like India. The work load didnโt go down. IT WENT UP !
bUt nExuS tHat hAs mOrE tO dO wItH thE sYtEm iN pLaCe nOt aI
I fucken know that, but that's exactly why it needs to be said. Letting tech bros create the narrative is going to lead to those changes in structure that makes exploitation easier.
People have less free time and are constantly exploited to keep doing MORE. If you do well you are rewarded with more work while the people at the top who don't know how to do shit get all the credit. "Make this faster! Get this done in half the time. Do this with half the budget" "weโre not hiring more people but we still want double the output." Management doesn't do shit and get's a raise for exploiting workers...
Literally, ANYONE can say:
โDo this faster.โ
โDo it with less money.โ
Thatโs not leadership. Thatโs exploitation.
They think theyโre Steve Jobs because they read one article on โ10x productivity.โ
Steve Jobs isnโt a a good role model for leadership. You canโt expect to build the biggest tech company by being a FUCKEN ASSHOLE to your team. He was the exception, not the blueprint.
Youโre doing 3x the work on half the time for the same pay. Meanwhile, the biggest task your manager accomplished after one week of work was making a PowerPoint called โDriving Excellence Through Scalable Synergies.โ That'll definitely fix the legacy codebase that hasnโt had a proper refactor since Obamaโs first term.
Creators who made these models possible? Theyโre barely getting credited, let alone compensated. Real progress doesnโt look like this. Real progress respects creators, builds transparency, and empowers people instead of exploiting them.
Maybe it's annoying to hear this negative take, But staying silent? That would be stupid as fuck. If We donโt talk about it, Theyโll pretend plagiarism and exploitation of workers is Fine...
AI is just like humans! โฆ until itโs not convenient
โIt learns just like a student!โ
Yes, If students learned from pirated textbooks and all got free education ๐
โIt learns like humans, so itโs fair use!โ
Is the same motherfucker who says
โItโs just a tool, we canโt assign blame to it for breaking the law or lying to people! ๐คโ
โItโs safe! weโve trained it on pUBliCly avAilAblE dAtA!
...Just donโt ask what data. Or from where. Or who. Or howโฆ ๐ฌโ
โYouRe JuSt aN ai H8Ter! ThE FuTuRe iS HeRe!๐คชโ
We simply canโt have it both ways.
You canโt say โAI is like humansโ and then argue that itโs just a tool when itโs not convenient.
Ai flops back and forth to avoid any kind of responsibility & this is an issue that affects everyone.
Overhyping AI doesn't help anyone...
We literally live in the worst timeline for AI.
Just look at our โhoverboards.โ
Shit doesnโt even fucken hover. THAT WAS THE WHOLE FUCKEN POINT OF A HOVER BOARD DUDE WTFFFF!
Same with AI. People treat it like a sentient being when itโs really just a text predictor on crack.
I know you probably think well wtf does Nexus Hue know about this stuff he's just an artist bitching about Ai. Clearly he is bias and doesn't understand machine learning like me...the Ai ENTHUSIAST ๐ค....drinking straight from Sam Altmans tit...
This is exactly why I am talking about it! CRITICAL THINKING IS FUCKEN DEAD! Every person who is "an expert in the Ai field" is bias as fuck. They NEED the plagiarism to clear if they wanna remove all the debt they have acquired.
Ai influencers depend on this clearing because their entire business is built on something that could turn into a gigantic legal shitstorm.
It's okay to use "Ai" in your business, just keep your head on
If you think this is the next big thing for your business, go for it. Use AI. play with it. You Ai diddler...
lol I'm just kidding but donโt get too comfortable with the low cost and lack of rules... Corporations donโt follow the rules, but everyone else does have to.
Donโt integrate it too deep into the business.
You canโt build on a shaky ass foundation & we both know this shit is shaky as fuuuuck
Data scraping? Shady as fuck !
The way these models where trained make people think that the entire law has changed but it has not. A lot of people who never had to worry about copyright law are now posting a lot of slop and Copyright law isn't even an after thought. This is something that you need to keep in mind, because the law takes a while to catch up.

This is starting to change, but itโs still sketchy. Iโve seen contracts on Indeed that pay video creators, actors and programmers to โethicallyโ help train their models. But, they only pay for the absolute best stuff out of all the data you send. So they cherry pick, and you need to send tons of data to get decent pay. Ai businesses on Linkedin have also started catching on to the fact that they can't follow the lead of big AI.


๐พ๐ค๐ง๐ฅ๐ค๐จ ๐ ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ๐...
Youโve got companies like Meta that just Zuck up the whole internet.
When corporations get big enough, theyโd rather say sorry after they fuck you instead of asking for permission. Insta doesn't even give people the option to opt out.
They want you to fill out a huge form to even consider maybe taking you out of the data pool. They also require you to FIND your data in the fucken sea of slop. If you do find it...They still want you to "prove it".
The good news is Meta got caught, I mean they get caught all the time but this was proved it in court in a lawsuit .. Their own lawyers literally told them to stop stealing and they did it anyway.
If we stay quiet they will keep trying to make this normal. It's not the first time they tried and it won't be the last.
"Metaโs lawyers had warned about the legal risks of using thousands of pirated books to train its AI models, but the company did it anyway..."
-Business Today
"Meta just lost a major fight in its ongoing legal battle with a group of authors suing the company for copyright infringement over how it trained its artificial intelligence models. "
-WIRED
โI am grateful that the defendants acted responsibly by swiftly removing the video they made,โ Carlinโs daughter Kelly Carlin said in a statement.
โWhile it is a shame that this happened at all, I hope this case serves as a warning about the dangers posed by AI technologies and the need for appropriate safeguards not just for artists and creatives, but every human on earth.โ
-WIRED
Zero accountability for corporations 100% liability for you...
Another massive issue, AI companies want to normalize taking no responsibility if you break the law using their tools.
Their plagiarism machine infringes on a copyright and got u sued?? Apparently thatโs on YOU.
Meanwhile, they keep doing whatever the hell they want.
Sometimes they do it on purpose, like using Studio Ghibli styles in their slop generators. They know that Hayao Miyazaki HATED Ai. Their "trend" turned everyone into their Ad!
Although It did also show us how ridiculously dumb it is to think that Ai is anything more than automated copying. Now that even babies can make Ai slop Its losing value FAST & making anyone who uses it look cheap as fuck๐
OpenAi doesn't care that the servers are melting. That's the only reason they got more investments. If nobody uses chatGPT then no money. If they use it too much investors get stupid happy and see dollar signs for when they finally get to flip that switch.
They know exactly what theyโre doing, & they know people will defend their โfriendโ ChatGPT. The more you see it as a friend the easier it is for them to keep taking away your rights. Even if you never make anything at all, eventually it catches up to everyone.
Aside from the tsunami of scams created to scam old people.
There is also ads using your face and voice without permission, you needed lot's of data now just 1 photo. How do you think Bytedance was able to make such a realistic Ai that makes faces?? hmmm maybe ALLL THE DATA TIKTOK PROVIDED???
Is it legal for them to use all your data?? Fuck no, but you can't prove it and if we normalize it then it's legal. You could end up seeing yourself promoting all kinds of things. It's already happening.
โMichel Janse, a Christian social media influencer, had her face likeness used in a YouTube advert without her consent.
The ad featured Janseโs face โin her bedroom, wearing her clothesโ to sell erectile dysfunction pills.
Experts speculated the advertisement had been generated by an AI trained on Janseโs regular posts on travel, home decor and wedding planning.โ
-AIAAIC
Venture capital Issue...
Once youโve got nowhere else to go? They flip the switch and raise the price. OpenAI and most AI companies arenโt even profitable right now. GPT Pro is $200/month and still not enough to break even. So if you rely too much on this stuff, guess what? When prices spike, youโre stuck with a fat-ass bill. All the ChatGPT wrappers? Theyโll have to raise their prices too. Automations in your biz? You might have to reevaluate if the hallucinations are still worth it when they flip that switch. If you rely on it too much then you just gotta bite the bullet and pay up.
โOpenAI Considers Hiking Prices As It Loses Money on ChatGPT Pro...famously bad at making money, but its new for-profit business model aims to change this soon...
Even after attracting over $3.7 billion in revenue last year, the company expected losses of around $5 billion due to expenditures like employee salaries, office rent, and the costs involved with training and running the AI models ChatGPT depend upon โ with the chatbot costing an eye-watering $700,000 a day during certain periods.โ
-AIAAIC
If Weโre building the future, Letโs not be stupid about it
โCourt has ruled that an 'artwork' generated solely by AI without human involvement is not eligible for copyright protection. It's part of a growing controversy over the use of AI in creative works...A judge confirmed in the ruling that copyrights can only be granted to works created by human authorsโ
- LifeWire
"On Tuesday, the US Copyright Office Review Board rejected copyright protection for an AI-generated 'artwork' that won a Colorado State Fair art contest last year because it lacks human authorship required for registration, Reuters reports."
- Ars Technica
โHow interesting is it to see how all these people on Twitter who are against AI-generated art are the first ones to throw the human under the bus by discrediting the human element! Does this seem hypocritical to you guys?โ
-Prompter Jason M. Allen
Quoted by PCMag
"You've gotta be real fucken stupid to use the website known for throwing artists under the bus... and then claim you need protection for your MIDjourney slop. Does this not seem hypocritical to Prompter Jason M. Allen?"
-Nexus fucken Hue
Do it right.
Ethically source ALL the data, not just the data from corporate giants that can stomp your ass.
Respect creators, none of this would even be possible without taking all their work and feeding it to the plagiarism machine.
Sam Altman can cry over Deepseek "taking their work" & they literally wanna ban them but they think stealing the entire internet is fine as long as it's done by them??
Do you have fucken brain damage Altman???
Protect all copyright, they do not and should not own your likeness. You canโt expect to get protection on your slop when you don't care that Ai doesn't respect anyone rights either.
You can't expect people to have sympathy over your ass getting automated or exploited & overworked when YOU where part of the problem.
Otherwise, it's just bunch of stupid contradictions.
Thatโs NOT โprogressโ, thatโs a confused tumble down to the bottom
Ai is just a tool! Same as a gun or
a tax haven...๐คฃ
Now, I know Iโve called out a lot of issues with AI, but I still believe it can be useful across most fields. People just need to be aware of the real costs, and theres a lot more than the ones I mentioned here. However there is also good uses like in the medical field. Restoring voices is one I read recently but also scam calls are at an all time high lol.
We just canโt get to a good place if we let the corporations dictate the direction of the future. They have already shown us they can't be trusted.